Re: [squid-users] New open-source ICAP server mod for url rewriting and headers manipulation.

why you don't play with ecap ?. it should faster than icap.
greasySpoon based on java, i'm not surprised consume much memory.
with i/e-cap you could also cache post request by using respmod vector.

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer_at_ngtech.co.il> wrote:
> as i was working with ICAP i saw that GreasySpoon ICAP server consumes a lot
> of memory and on load takes a lot of cpu from an unknown reasons so i was
> looking for an alternative and didnt find one but i found a basic icap
> server that i modified to be more modular and also to work with
> instances\forks.
>
> the main goal of this specific modification is to make it simple to use for
> url_rewriting.
>
> tests that was done until now for performance was on:
> client--->squid\gw------->server
> 1Gbit lan speed between all
> client spec - intel atom 410D 2gb ram opensuse
> squid spec - intel atom 510D 2GB ram Gentoo + squid 3.1.19 + ruby 1.9.3_p125
> server spec - 4GB core i3 opensuse 64 bit nginx serving simple html "it's
> wokrs"
>
> with apache benchmark tools:
> ab -c 1000 -n 4000 "http://otherdomain_to_rewrite/"
>
> served all requests and about 800+ reqs per sec.
>
> download at: https://github.com/elico/squid-helpers/tree/master/echelon-mod
>
> looking for testers to make sure that the server is good.
>
> notes: the forks aren't build that good so in a case of termination by
> exceptions runtime error only one fork goes down and you must kill all the
> others manually to to restart the server.
>
> logs have a huge amount of output on a production environment so it's
> recommended to not use it at all if you dont need it.
>
>
> --
> Eliezer Croitoru
> https://www1.ngtech.co.il
> IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
> eliezer <at> ngtech.co.il
Received on Thu Jun 14 2012 - 19:44:29 MDT