Re: [squid-users] Pb migrating 3.1.19 to 3.2.1 - was Re: [squid-users] Impressions of 3.2.1

Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:

>
> Well, I didn't succeeded to get a core dump.
>
> Looking a little more at /var/adm/messages, I see that the signal received isn't
> SIGSEGV (11) but SIGIOT (6). Maybe (not sure) this explains why I can't get a
> core dump.

Well, this isn't coherent with the content of the death (tools.cc) exit
function, where the squid log message is printed. But the signal value isn't
coherent either with what is logged by syslog... ;-(

JM

>
> ******************
>
> Sep 11 14:51:52 cc-proxy-2 squid[20881]: [ID 604506 local4.notice] Squid Parent:
> (squid-1) process 21011 exited due to signal 6 with status 0
> Sep 11 14:51:55 cc-proxy-2 squid[20881]: [ID 632156 local4.notice] Squid Parent:
> (squid-1) process 21022 started
>
> ******************
>
> Is the file cache.log got with some value of debug_option OK for you ?
>
>>
>>>
>>> Setting debug option to configuration file, I get :
>>>
>>> 2012/09/04 12:06:11.412 kid1| storeCreate: Selected dir 0 for -1_at_-1=0/2/1/1
>>> FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying.
>>>
>>> I reinitialized the cache_dir partition, but this changes nothing.
>>>
>>> I have another machine, same hardware same OS but no cache, which works fine.
>>>
>
>

-- 
  Envoyé de ma machine à écrire.
  ---------------------------------------------------------------
   Spam : Classement statistique de messages électroniques -
          Une approche pragmatique
   Chez Amazon.fr : http://amzn.to/LEscRu ou http://bit.ly/SpamJM
  ---------------------------------------------------------------
  Jose Marcio MARTINS DA CRUZ            http://www.j-chkmail.org
  Ecole des Mines de Paris                   http://bit.ly/SpamJM
  60, bd Saint Michel                      75272 - PARIS CEDEX 06
  mailto:Jose-Marcio.Martins_at_mines-paristech.fr