Re: [squid-users] Cache_peer config

From: Sekar Duraisamy <sekarit_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:06:40 +0530

Hi Amos,

Thanks a lot. Even my configuration is working fine in Squid-3.1.15
. I believe there could be bug in squid-3.1.14

Anyhow thanks a lot to all.

Regards,
Sekar

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> On 28/11/2012 1:48 a.m., 金 戈 wrote:
>>
>> This is my configure, and we use squid mutli-instance. 2 squid2.7 as
>> frontend, and 3 squid2.7 as backend.And it's load-balanced.
>>
>> cache_peer ip1 parent 3128 0 carp no-netdb-exchange no-digest no-query
>> login=PASS no-tproxy name=backend1a http11
>> cache_peer ip2 parent 3128 0 carp no-netdb-exchange no-digest no-query
>> login=PASS no-tproxy name=backend1b http11
>> cache_peer ip3 parent 3128 0 carp no-netdb-exchange no-digest no-query
>> login=PASS no-tproxy name=backend1c http11
>
>
> If you want HTTP/1.1 features you are better off upgrading to Squid-3.2 than
> using the experimental features in 2.7. Yes they work well, but are
> incomplete and 3.2 contains a lot of additional feature support (including
> SMP support).
>
> "no-tproxy" is a Squid-3.1 feature. Plus squid-2.7 does not support TPROXYv4
> which is embeded in modern (2.30+) Linux kernels.
>
> Amos
Received on Wed Nov 28 2012 - 13:36:48 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Nov 28 2012 - 12:00:05 MST