Re: [squid-users] Re: Squid did not use the next set cache

-----Original Message-----
From: RW
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2012 11:24 PM
To: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] Re: Squid did not use the next set cache

On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:54:09 +0100
David Touzeau wrote:

> Dear,
>
> I have set 2 caches on my squid 3.2.5
>
> #--------- Multiple cpus -- (disabled)
> workers 1
> cache_dir aufs /var/squid/cache1 1105 16 256 max-size=716800
> cache_dir ufs /var/cache/squid 2000 16 256
>
> in caches infos we ca see that the first cache is full at 94% and
> second cache is 0%
>
> Why squid did not use the second cache in order to store objects ?

Is there any particular reason that one of the caches is aufs and one
ufs?

I don't know for sure but it wouldn't surprise me if mixing the two
doesn't work well with the default selection algorithm which is
least-load. The on disk format of aufs and ufs is the same so it's easy
to test.

Thanks

It seems that make caches on the same type works better...
Received on Wed Jan 02 2013 - 23:40:41 MST