Re: [squid-users] Re: R: [squid-users] WARNING: no_suid: setuid(0): (1) Operation not permitted

On 02/05/2013 06:08 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 6/02/2013 3:58 a.m., Simone Levy wrote:
>> should this issue be reported as a bug or otherwise dealt with?

> It is already reported as http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3763

Amos, bug 3763 is not about setuid(0) warnings, although both bugs may
have been caused by the same Coverity-inspired motivation to check the
return values of system calls.

Simone, yes, I think you should report the setuid warning bug. If you
do, please note that it appears to be BSD-specific.

Thank you,

Alex.

> The change in 3.2.7 was simply to report several error conditions which
> were being silently discarded without explanation. We need to find out
> properly what the shm -1 are meaning before a proper fix can be comitted.
>
> Amos
Received on Wed Feb 06 2013 - 21:49:26 MST