[squid-users] RE: peer-cache question

From: babajaga <augustus_meyer_at_yahoo.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:20:48 -0700 (PDT)

Which version of squid are you using ?
squid -v
Also interesting to see the ./configure options.

Do you really need 1/2 parent proxies ? Or do you simply want to split up
the traffic to the two interfaces ?

In case you need parent(s), then I would use 2.
(Although it should also be possible to do everything within just one
Simply to make the setup "safer". Because you will have to fiddle around
with https-part for quite some time, I guess, so not to touch the other
branch. :-)

Splitting up to two parents can be done using something like

acl google url_regex -i ^https?://.*?google\.com/
cache_peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxx parent 3128 0 no-query no-digest
no-netdb-exchange name=default_parent
cache_peer yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy parent 3128 0 no-query no-digest
no-netdb-exchange name=google_parent

cache_peer_access google_parent allow google
cache_peer_access default_parent allow !google

#Not shure, if next ones are necessary. However, sequence of ACL checking is
sometimes a bit strange
#cache_peer_access default_parent deny google
#cache_peer_access google_parent deny !google

View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/peer-cache-question-tp4659419p4659453.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Wed Apr 10 2013 - 11:20:54 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 10 2013 - 12:00:05 MDT