Re: [squid-users] Re: Optimized Configuration?

From: Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer_at_ngtech.co.il>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:24:16 +0300

Hey,

Consider what Amos suggested... using Kerberos rather NTLM.
 From what I understand this machine can easily take the load with basic
settings.
Dansguardian is another story...
it's a more in depth proxy which will consume more CPU and will do a
thing or two more then squidguard.
The only deference is the needs for the environment.
70 users is not that much for regular proxy but in a case that someone
will try a DDOS from a browser I would go and do some basic iptables
limits to restrict the users to basic limits of fair usage.

There is indeed a lot of changes but the basics are that you install and
it works like a magic.
if you do have a list of specific needs it can be done and tuned easily.

Just share the needs squid.conf and what you have done until now.
We can help you with basic suggestions.

Eliezer

On 06/26/2013 12:50 PM, guzzzi wrote:
> Many thanks for your Reply.
>
> Ok i think Hardware is strong enough. Its a Intel QuadCore / 8GB Ram / SSD
> Harddisk. This one is only for Squid, Samba, Dansguardian nothing more on
> this Machine. For about 70 users.
>
> But im more looking for an Optimized Configuration. My last was was from
> Squid 2.x and now i installed 3.3.5 and there is a lot of Changed. Thats why
> i ask.
>
> Many Thanks
> Best Regards
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Optimized-Configuration-tp4660784p4660786.html
> Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Received on Wed Jun 26 2013 - 16:24:37 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 27 2013 - 12:00:07 MDT