Re: [squid-users] Re: Squid still not using "icap_preview_size"?

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:39:42 +1200

On 16/07/2013 5:40 a.m., Tom Tom wrote:
> Hi
> Any hints/answers concerning the "icap_preview_size" with the current
> squid (3.3.7/3.3.8)?

Nothing has changed in that regard AFAIK.

If it is important to you, please subscribe to this bug and you will
receive notification if/when it changes:
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2765

IMO we will probably just remove the *_size option entirely.

> Thanks a lot.
> Tom
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Tom Tom wrote:
>> Hi
>> Concerning the following post:
>> http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/About-quot-icap-preview-size-quot-td4658484.html
>>
>> - Does squid still not use (current version 3.3.6) the icap_preview_size?
>> - If the ICAP-Server requests previewing, what does squid herefore?

If I am understanding Alex right that depends on the other setting
icap_preview_enable ON/OFF.
Squid should be sending the negotiated preview size (ignoring the
icap_preview_size config), unless it has preview disabled entirely.

Amos
Received on Tue Jul 16 2013 - 09:39:52 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 16 2013 - 12:00:17 MDT