Re: [squid-users] Re: cache_replacement_policy ==> Clarification Please & Thank You

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 16:42:30 +1200

On 1/09/2013 4:25 a.m., HillTopsGM wrote:
> I sure appreciate the time you spent on this Amos! Thanks
>
> I thought I could maximize my chance of caching what I wanted cached If
> This Would Work
> <http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/cache-dir-size-v-s-available-RAM-tp4661705p4661868.html>
>
> Failing that, did you have an opinion as to whether or not 'heap' was better
> than the 'lru' with regards to windows updates?

I have no idea really. My goals with caching when I evaluate them is to
maximize bandwidth savings and minimize time/CPU overheads. I run a CDN
double-timing as both Hosting and ISP gateway caches.

Amos
Received on Sun Sep 01 2013 - 04:42:34 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 01 2013 - 12:00:06 MDT