Re: [squid-users] FileSystem mount options and other parameters

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 22:08:17 +1300

On 18/03/2014 9:29 p.m., Omid Kosari wrote:
> AFAIK there is no complete guide for using FS types for squid . Historically
> i am using ReiserFS 3.6 on Ubuntu 12.10 64bit .
>
> Here is my /etc/fstab
>
> /dev/sda1 /cache1 reiserfs
> notail,noatime,nodiratime,data=writeback,barrier=none,async,commit=10 0 0
> /dev/sdb1 /cache2 reiserfs
> notail,noatime,nodiratime,data=writeback,barrier=none,async,commit=10 0 0
> /dev/sdc1 /cache3 reiserfs
> notail,noatime,nodiratime,data=writeback,barrier=none,async,commit=10 0 0
>
>
> and
>
> root_at_cache:~# cat /sys/block/sd*/queue/scheduler
> noop [deadline] cfq
>
>
> And some references
> https://reiser4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Mount
> http://doc.opensuse.org/products/draft/SLES/SLES-tuning_sd_draft/cha.tuning.io.html
>
> sda id SSD and sdb,sdc are SCSI 19k RPM and i think they should not be same
> .
>
> Note :For people who are not aware , i suggest investigating on these
> configs because they are very important for performance tuning of cache
> server .
>
> Anybody has suggestions ?
>
>
> 2 more questions .
> 1 - Why squid does not going to implement its own FS ? even it may based on
> other filesystems .

You mean caches like COSS and Rock ?

COSS could work on a raw device (at least the 2.7 version could). Rock
does not (yet) simply because none has sponsored the work to make it so.

> 2 - Why squid experts does not share their such configs and customizations
> on wiki ?

Good Question. Instructions on getting access to edit the
wiki.squid-cache.org is on the front page in a big highlighted box.
Those of us in the dev team with knowledge have already added it, a few
others too (http://wiki.squid-cache.org/BestOsForSquid).

Amos
Received on Tue Mar 18 2014 - 09:09:10 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Mar 18 2014 - 12:00:06 MDT