Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> I have been overlooking these for a while on the assumption that it was 
>> gdb catching something when it should have left it. I have just started 
>> wondering if this was in fact bad unexpected behaviour for the squid 
>> signals. Should I be looking into it?
> 
> Nope!
> 
> put this in ~/.gdbinit:
> 
> handle all nostop noprint
> handle SIGSEGV stop
> handle SIGPIPE stop
> 
Thanks for that Adrian. I have tested it in my config now.
"handle SIGPIPE stop" did the opposite of what is wanted, "nostop print" 
lets me know when they occur, but leaves squid running. I assume it was 
a typos or version defaults difference?
Amos
Received on Sun Jul 08 2007 - 00:38:24 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Aug 01 2007 - 12:00:06 MDT