Re: unlink bottleneck

From: Brian Denehy <B-Denehy@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 1997 17:16:00 +1100

| Hello,
|
| Brian Denehy wrote:
| > 1.1 has generally proved somewhat more difficult to keep in bounds than
| > its predecessors in my experience. Maybe if I had 30% spare disk it
| > wouldn't be a problem, but I generally feel it needs more manual
| > cleanup. Having an unlinkd might help a lot.
|
| I suppose that's due to the refresh-check method, instead of the old
| expiry-based one?
|
Miguel,
Basically yes. Tuning lifetimes so as not to run out of filesystem space
seems a little more of an art than it used to be. And even when the
objects/bucket is down at 20 there is still a significant performance
hit as unlinking kicks into high gear.
Brian
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:40 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:11:15 MST