Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Actually it would be nice to have something more yet:
> > - shared caches (at least IP, FQDN, authentications, whatever
> > and why not? shared in-core cached objects.
>
> .. whats wrong with running a resolver on your localhost which handles
> caching? :-)
Nothing.
> Nothing wrong with heavily OS dependant if we give people the
> option of being able to do it.
Well, it might be wrong if it impairs portability.
> as far as I know under UNIX, we have to sit on accept(). -)
Yep, but accept() might be sheduled between different processes for the
same socket.
/Henrik
Received on Tue Oct 17 2000 - 08:08:27 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:50 MST