Re: background check (sourceforge store_check branch)

From: Robert Collins <robert.collins@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 20:58:21 +1100

The Aufs and Diskd changes are in place. As usual I haven't touched coss
(other than setting the *function NULL).

Rob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
To: <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 11:36 AM
Subject: background check (sourceforge store_check branch)

> Well I've got a beta quality UFS background check running happily here. I
> just went and deleted a couple thousand swap files out from under squid
> while it was running, and it caught their absence and released happily.
>
> If anyone would like to play with it please do , it's on sourceforge.
>
> Currently it works like the rebuild code - check x items at a time. I
think
> long term it really should have a queue of up to x items, and then run
> callbacks for handling the results. Then UFS comes straight back, and AUFS
/
> diskd can be better used. However, one step at a time :].
>
> I'd like to know that the approach is correct before I get into tuning it
> like that.
>
> I haven't done any changes to the aufs/diskd validation yet... but I
should
> have that committed this afternoon as the fs/ changes are trivial.
>
> Rob
>
>
Received on Mon Nov 27 2000 - 02:50:59 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:00 MST