Robert Collins wrote:
> Version 45 ? Seriously though, if the licence has a grey area would UCSD
> agree to putting an explicit statement for binary modules on the bottom?
> After all, we're not changing the copyright - we're explaining how use
> of the squid run-time module mechanism (after all there will be headers
> to use and interfaces they must meet) constitutes a derivative. (Or
> doesn't, depending on majority opinion here.
So leave the issue blank, and let the companies who wishes to release
non-free modules worry about the issue. After all, it is their neck at
risk if there ever is a problem.
What we can do is to add a note in the API documentation warning people
that there might be an issue with the GPL license and releaseing
non-free Squid modules.
/ Henrik
Received on Fri Apr 20 2001 - 02:55:13 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:47 MST