Re: -O vs -O2, revisited

From: Robert Collins <robert.collins@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 23:58:35 +1000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 11:49 PM
Subject: -O vs -O2, revisited

>
> Hi,
>
> gcc under FreeBSD 4.3 is still generating some invalid code
> with -O2.
>
> Its the same problem that was reported in the squid-2.4pre's,
> where gcc generates an xor reg, reg in the beginning of some
> routine in the internal DNS handling.
>
> Can we please default back to -O?
>
> If people want to use -O2 they can override it, but I think more
people
> are going to have serious issues with gcc -O2 as they start installing
> freebsd-4.x.
>
> And no, its not a freebsdism, its a
gcc-under-a-non-linux-i386-platform
> ism. :(
>

Yeah.. openBSD has the same headache.

Rob
Received on Sat May 05 2001 - 08:01:07 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:59 MST