Re: bugzilla query:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@hem.passagen.se>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
Cc: "Squid-Dev (E-mail)" <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: bugzilla query:

> Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > Doesn't someone get emailed automatically when a new bug is logged?
If
> > the component owner is the one emailed, feel free to make me the
"auth"
> > owner, and I'll act on those bugs fairly quickly (the next weekend
after
> > the logging, at worst).
>
> That is the intention, but does not work entirely the way intended yet
> it seems..
>
> --
> Henrik
>

Currently the component owners are:

auth wessels Authentication modules
doc wessels Documentation, such as it is
feature squid-bugs@squid-cache.org Requests for new features
lib wessels Library routines
src wessels The main source tree

Which means that wessels@www.squid-cache.org will be emailed. I don't
know how much time Duane has, but I assume it's fairly limited? Perhaps
if we nominate a owner for each of the five current modules, and they
are the ones to get emailed on new bug creation. The concept being that
an individual who is a component owner is responsible for reviewing new
bugzilla entries within a preset timeframe, and either assigning to a
more relevant person, or addressing themselves. I.E. the owner of the
squid-doc project at sourceforge might be a better choice for the "doc"
component, rather than Duane.

Please don't think I'm pushing this: I'm very happy _not_ to be the
actual auth "owner" and for Duane to assign auth-related things to me
when it's appropriate. But on the other hand, delegating this sort of
thing out can be beneficial.

Thoughts?

Rob
Received on Tue May 22 2001 - 02:46:55 MDT