[Fwd: Re: [squid-users] does 2.4 daily tarball need patches?]

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:10:24 +0200

attached mail follows:


>There are more fixes included in the tarball. Not all bugs and bugfixes
>are published on the bugs page.

  Hmm,Henrik, I myself am reluctant to switching to one
of the tarballs :-) because it leads for me to a possible
'discussion-in-the-dark' syndrome on the long term.

I am staying with the official 2.4S1 for the moment.
My advice to the delevopers would be to release a 2.4S2 anyway
as todays tarball, for instance.

Yet some hard bugs my remain, but it gives the 'mail community'
the opportunity to keep contributing to observing and analyzing
SQUID's problems.

And I am sure that the brilliant SQUID developers will soon
solve all problems afterwards in the 2.4S3 release... :-)

Marc.

-- 
 'Love is truth without any future.
 (M.E. 1997)
Received on Wed Jun 27 2001 - 10:33:44 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:04 MST