On Sun, Aug 19, 2001, Joe Cooper wrote:
> Agreed, if for no other reason than to save me from having to argue with
> folks that the daily snap of 2.4 is actually /more stable/ than the
> STABLE release.
>
> It would save packagers trouble as well, since most OS packagers prefer
> to start from a STABLE and then patch it with known bug fixes (it
> doesn't bother me to build from a daily, but for many folks it
> does--goes against policy, gives the impression of instability, or
> whatever). Many little twiddly bits never become patches in the Squid
> bug list...but they do go into the tree.
As the squid ports maintainer for FreeBSD, I agree. :-)
Ok. So shall we go for a quick MFC run of code to squid24?
For example, I can MFC the COSS changes, along with a file
I have lying around explaining how to make it tick for
testing.
Adrian
Received on Sun Aug 19 2001 - 21:44:04 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:13 MST