Re: refcount allcoator

Robert Collins wrote:

> I don't think having it in 2.5 poses any stability risk - as nothing
> uses it.

So why then have it in 2.5?

refcount is as announced in the queue for 2.6. Before 2.6 can start we need
to get 2.5 a bit more bugtested. If we start on 2.6 now 2.5 will most
likely loose in testing which in the end bites us back.

My goal is that we should be able to branch 2.5 within a month. As soon as
this happens most of the queue will get merged into HEAD, including
refcount.

--
Henrik