On Thu, Sep 13, 2001, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> We have had this discussion a couple of times.
>
> The most logical approach is extending the cachemgr interface with more
> active options like this. Have done so previously when I needed to
> selectively reload parts of the configuration (more specifically included
> acl definitions). This however was not accepted by Duane at the time.
Hence why i implemented it as an internal URL rather than a
cachemgr option.
> I think the last time we discussed this the conlcusion was that there
> should be a better local control mechanism replacing the -k xxx signals
> used today, for example by using a named pipe or unix domain socket. This
> could then easily be extended with active actions like the ones discussed.
Agreed. However, after playing around with this, I actually like
the idea of doing it via internal URLs. I think its extensible enough,
and its a target for fine-grain ACL controls via the normal ACLs,
rather than having to recode new ones.
Adrian
Received on Thu Sep 13 2001 - 03:15:15 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:20 MST