Re: Peer twiddling

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > Hence why i implemented it as an internal URL rather than a
> > cachemgr option.
>
> More or less the same thing, less security, less supportive framework. Not sure
> it is such a good approach.
>
> What we need to decide upon is if we want these active actions over HTTP, or on
> a separate channel.

Oh, I agree that it should be a cachemgr "option" rather than an
internal URL. But I was working within the framework of choices
that may have had a reasonable chance of being committed.

> I agree that having the actions over HTTP is nice indeed, but if we are I think
> the cachemgr interface is the correct place to stick them.

*nod*

Duane - why didn't you want to add stuff like this to the cachemgr?

Adrian
Received on Thu Sep 13 2001 - 04:58:33 MDT