"Chemolli Francesco (USI)" wrote:
> > Agreed. However, after playing around with this, I actually like
> > the idea of doing it via internal URLs. I think its extensible enough,
> > and its a target for fine-grain ACL controls via the normal ACLs,
> > rather than having to recode new ones.
>
> I'd like to find the time and work in a telnettable configuration system
> or something. Wouldn't be easy though. Goodies like auto-completion don't
> come cheap.
Well.. in the GNU world we have readline. Does most of the dirty work (you
still need to provide it with a method of finding the possible
completetions.. it can't guess what your application is expecting)
but for this kind of thing even having a telnet interface is defenitely
overkill. Also, there are mostly the same security issues with having a
HTTP interface, except that you do not have the full ACL controls we already
have for HTTP, or the additional access controls (passwords) we have for
cachemgr.
--
Henrik
Received on Thu Sep 13 2001 - 06:27:09 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:20 MST