My opinions on nocache and nocache_hack. :-)

From: <maer727@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 12:06:40 +0800 (CST)

Hi, pals!

After reading severals of source codes, I think nocache_hack is
the same as nocache if HTTP_VIOLATIONS is defined. I have met
with serveral cases where we treat the two variables the same if
HTTP_VIOLATIONS is defined.

Am I correct?

Best regards,
George Ma
Received on Fri Apr 26 2002 - 22:06:45 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: maer727@dont-contact.us: "Puzzled at STORE_PENDING. :-)"
Previous message: maer727@dont-contact.us: "回复:Re: Puzzled at store_client->seen_offset(copy_offset)."
Next in thread: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: My opinions on nocache and nocache_hack. :-)"
Reply: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: My opinions on nocache and nocache_hack. :-)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:15:22 MST