Re: change proposal

I thought the null cache dir left out disk access but still kept a
memory cache, while no_cache deny all will never cache anything even to
cache_mem?

Or am I misunderstanding the suggestion or the current behavior?

Robert Collins wrote:
> Lets eliminate the null cache dir - with
> no_cache deny all
> we get the same end user effect - nothing stored - but we also win in
> that none of the store logic is every applied.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Rob

-- 
Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
Web caching appliances and support.
http://www.swelltech.com