Re: Needing state in NTLMSSP

On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 18:59, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> Which is the path we have to go I think. See my proposal last time this
> was discussed. I assume this is what you refer to by 'v2' helper
> protocol.
>
V2 is the helper-squid revision 2 protocol I think. We had exactly the
interface Andrew suggests back in the early days. It's actually a
straight forward case of removing optimisations to get what he needs.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.