Re: -F ?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: 28 Feb 2003 12:46:27 +0100

http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=513

Regards
Henrik

fre 2003-02-28 klockan 12.06 skrev Adrian Chadd:
> Hi,
>
> Here's another one. I've just hit an issue where a pair of squids are
> in a magical redundant setup (if the master fails, the backup takes
> over the IP).
>
> The measure of "failed" is "http port isn't bound".
>
> Now, the -F option to squid makes it rebuild faster BUT it still binds to
> the socket. It doesn't even seem to serve internal requests.
>
> I don't think this is "correct" behaviour, at least from the output of
> squid -?:
>
> -F Don't serve any requests until store is rebuilt.
>
> Would anyone mind if I changed the code so the incoming http request socket(s)
> aren't bound until the rebuild finishes if -F is set? I think, personally,
> it makes more sense.
>
>
>
>
> adrian

-- 
Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>
MARA Systems AB, Sweden
Received on Fri Feb 28 2003 - 04:46:34 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:19:18 MST