Re: squid-2.5 and coss

From: Robert Collins <robertc@dont-contact.us>
Date: 14 Aug 2003 18:22:12 +1000

On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 15:54, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Thursday 14 August 2003 07.45, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > Well, theoretically, I should be able to easily forwardport my COSS
> > changes to 3.0 once I know it works. Believe me, once its running
> > I'm going to be looking to move to 3.0. kqueue and epoll are my
> > next thing to sell. :)
>
> Not forwardport the changes to Squid-3 is plain stupid as it locks you
> in to Squid-2.5.
>
> It would be very undesireable from a release management perspective if
> COSS in Squid-2.5 is newer than COSS in Squid-3.0, and neither me or
> Robert will be very happy if this happens.

Let me add:
It will be a -lot- easier for you to:
Get 3.0 stable on those uni caches.
Get kqueue / epoll stable on those uni caches.
Then get COSS stable on 3.0,
than to:
get COSS stable.
get 3.0 stable
get coss with 3.0 stable
get coss with 3.0 stable with epoll/kqueue.

But hey - it's your dime.

Cheers,
Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.

Received on Thu Aug 14 2003 - 02:22:27 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:20:28 MST