Re: squid-2.5 and coss

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 19:54:43 -0600

On Thu, Aug 21, 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 05:45, Duane Wessels wrote:
>
> > FYI, my coss changes have not been commited to squid-3 yet because
> >
> > - I was going to wait until the time when it is okay to
> > commit non-bugs to the tree.
>
> And on this note - anything that is ok to checkinto the Stable 2.5 tree
> is ok to commit into the 3.0 tree.
>
> It is feature-frozen, but by definition anything going into 2.5 is a
> bugfix :}.
>

Yeah - Henrik pointed out that COSS, being "experimental", is fine to muck
around with in squid-3 as long as we don't need to touch anything else in
the tree.

Here's a fun suggestion from our friend Robert - how about creating a
_directory_ instead of a file for the COSS cachedir? Then we can place
the store logfile in there, the coss storefile in there _and_ any other
metadata. It'd make life a whole lot easier and mean you won't get bitten
by the requirement to specify swaplog paths..

Comments?

adrian
Received on Tue Aug 26 2003 - 19:54:47 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:20:30 MST