Re: squid-2.5 and coss

On Wednesday 27 August 2003 09.51, Kinkie wrote:

> BTW: O_DIRECT would be a good approach to our FS I/O work but:
> - we need to be able to keep an object hot after reading it - the
> OS won't do it for us anymore

This is already on the todo, at least last time we discussed how Squid
cache should be designed. The hot object cache should be separate
from the transit objects, and include swapin objects.

> - it only supports reading and writing on page boundaries,
> typically 4kb (we'd need to be able to pad)

Which should not be much of a problem I think..

Regards
Henrik
Received on Wed Aug 27 2003 - 02:30:08 MDT