On 19 Nov 2003, Gonzalo Arana wrote:
> icpUdpSend: FD 11 sending ICP_DENIED, 103 bytes to REMOTE-IP:3130
> assertion failed: HttpHeader.cc:374: "hdr->owner > hoNone && hdr->owner
> <= hoReply"
>
> hdr->owner is 0 (zero), so hdr->owner > hoNone is violated.
Most likely the header is destroyed twice, and already freed when this
assertion tries to verify that the header data is valid.. (which is why it
does not find valid information).
> Is that assert ok? Should it be hdr->owner >= hoNone?
The assert is most likely OK, and exists to trap cases like this.
A backtrace in a bugzilla report would be nice..
Regards
Henrik
Received on Wed Nov 19 2003 - 15:28:44 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:20:47 MST