Re: More IMS

From: Mike Matusiak <m.matusiak@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:47:12 +0200

Hello

A couple of questions:
Let's assume Squid sent IMS to the server and received a response.

Q1: Which cases should flow to processMiss()?

Q2: In processMiss() Squid sends IMS again. Is this correct?

Q3: There can be a case when server responds 304 with Last-Modified
which is different than cached reply's Last-Modified - this is the
situation when servers sends 'garbage' reply. Should we consider this as
a correct result?

Q4: Let's assume that response is 503 Service Unavailable. If there is
no expiry information with that response we should "negatively cache"
this one. Squid doesn't do this but sends old cached reply. Is this
correct behaviour? What with other responses that can be "negatively
cached"?

Regards
Mike
Received on Thu Apr 22 2004 - 21:13:49 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Apr 29 2004 - 12:00:03 MDT