Re: NTLM status on Squid 3.0

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:15:46 +0100 (CET)

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Serassio Guido wrote:

> My question comes from the doubt about the opportunity of merge into HEAD
> some forward ported NTLM changes that should be replaced from a new NTLM
> implementation after a few time, or, in the worst case, could conflict with
> the NTLM refactoring.

The major risk here is waste of efforts, with the refactoring throwing out
most if not all of the code related to the bugfixes..

On the other hand, if the bugfixes involve any changes to the core of
Squid then these parts is very valuable to get ported across to Squid-3.

Any bugfixes related to challenge reuse is obviously not very important to
get ported across as that part will be thrown out anyway.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Sun Jan 23 2005 - 16:15:49 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 12:00:02 MST