Re: wccp2 and squid reload semantics

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:16:10 +0800

Hm, reading the IETF draft again does show a "shutdown" command which
we should probably send if we've removed a service/router.

adrian

On Tue, Apr 18, 2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> tis 2006-04-18 klockan 10:49 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd:
>
> > What should the cache reload semantics be when Squid is reloaded?
> > Should I just start sending the updated here_i_am messages and let
> > the routers sort everything out? Or is there a better way to handle
> > this?
>
> It's probably possible to do it "smart", but it's sorted out
> automatically pretty quickly so there is not much to gain from trying to
> be smart, at least not compared to the complexity to get it correct..
>
> I guess it would be possible without too much effort to keep an MD5
> checksum or similar of the wccp2 config section, and only restart the
> WCCP if there has actually been any relevant configuration changes..
>
> Regards
> Henrik
Received on Mon Apr 17 2006 - 22:17:33 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon May 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MDT