Re: commloops revisited

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:52:28 +0800

[snip]

> But it's a bit too much rework of the internals to match the 2.6
> release. This not only touches the comm loop, but pretty much every
> single protocol module.
>
> This should be done in Squid-3. In Squid-2 the goal is just to make it
> work, not be pretty.

I'm going to leave it all until after 2.6 is released. We'll know then
whether more tidying up is required (ie, 2.6 isn't as stable as it should
be.)

Adrian
Received on Wed May 24 2006 - 19:54:33 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 12:00:04 MDT