Re: commloops revisited

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 04:11:37 +0200

tor 2006-05-25 klockan 08:43 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd:

> This is why I wanted to keep the comm code reasonably untouched and leave
> this as a structural change.

I agree on the structural/reshuffling changes, and see no problem with
having these in. Only benefits.

Sure there is a bit of duplicated code, but it's not that bad. And the
split does make many things easier.

Regards
Henrik

Received on Wed May 24 2006 - 20:11:42 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 12:00:04 MDT