Re: squid-3 vs 2.6

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:16:57 +0200

sön 2006-06-25 klockan 17:43 +1200 skrev Doug Dixon:

> > - Parts of the SSL cleanup. Main requirements being the pending bits
> > in the comm code, or refactoring solving this I/O operation
> > independence
> > differently.

Bug #1633.

> > - Reasonable read defer management.

Bug #1634

> > - COSS ng (or whatever to call what Adrian is doing to COSS).
> > Some of
> > this actually fits better in Squid-3 with it's re-factored I/O
> > framework.

This is already on Adrians schedule. Not sure there need to be a
bugzilla entry..

> > - >2GB objects

Bug #437.

> > - HTCP updates

Bug #1635.

> > - Many small bugfixes here and there in the new features common to
> > both trees.
> > - probably a bit more

We have to take these on a case by case basis as they are encountered in
3.0 I think.

Regards
Henrik

Received on Mon Jun 26 2006 - 16:17:02 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Jun 30 2006 - 12:00:02 MDT