Re: squid-3 vs 2.6

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 08:22:40 +0800

On Tue, Jun 27, 2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> > > - COSS ng (or whatever to call what Adrian is doing to COSS).
> > > Some of
> > > this actually fits better in Squid-3 with it's re-factored I/O
> > > framework.
>
> This is already on Adrians schedule. Not sure there need to be a
> bugzilla entry..

I'd love it if people would put their COSS-related crashes into Bugzilla.
This probably won't happen until Squid-2.6 is -STABLE and people try out
COSS. :/

Which reminds me, I should really spend some time making sensible defaults
when COSS is using AUFS - right now the aiops code doesn't create any threads
because n_aufs_dirs (or whatever it is) is set to 0; one has to override
it by the ./configure option (--with-aufs-threads=). That will get rid of
at least one runtime problem (ie, no IO threads, so COSS doesn't do anything :)

Adrian
Received on Mon Jun 26 2006 - 18:19:55 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Jun 30 2006 - 12:00:02 MDT