On Tue, Apr 10, 2007, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> > The update to rfc1035 is a reversal of previous changes which is again
> > stabilising that area a little more.
>
> This is not my area. Any objections from others to committing the
> rfc1035 part of the patch?
>
None from me.
(My vote is always "go ahead" unless I raise a concern.)
Adrian
Received on Tue Apr 10 2007 - 22:05:36 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun Apr 29 2007 - 12:00:03 MDT