Re: fixing >4k reply header store reads

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:48:39 +0900

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008, Henrik Nordstr?m wrote:

> We are not talking about a 4k buffer, we are talking about an almost
> arbitrary amount of data (needs to support at least 64 KB or response
> headers, preferably only limited by configuration reply_max_header_siz).
> It's not clear to me what buffer size will be used.
>
> If the store buffer size is increased to 64 kb and this is paged in and
> used as a backing for the header sting objects then it will stay around
> for as long as the reply is, which can be quite some time if it's a
> large object. This can be quite a waste when there normally is only some
> hundred bytes or so of response headers..

Who says the store buffer size needs to be fixed?

Adrian
Received on Tue Jan 08 2008 - 19:39:36 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Jan 30 2008 - 12:00:09 MST