Re: Valgrind results

On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:23 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:

> I found that in 3.x as well. It turns out those bits of valgrind code
> only occur if both --enable-leakfinder and --with-valgrind-debug are
> enabled.
>
> My test script only had "--with-valgrind" which wasn't doing even the
> job it needed to :-(

Odd..

> FWIW: Is there any reason why we need separate leakfinder and valgrind
> modes?

valgrind should implicitly enable leakfinder I think. The leakfinder
code is independent from valgrind however.

And additionally the code fragment discussed should not even depend on
leakfinder, only valgrind..

Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue Mar 25 2008 - 04:32:52 MDT