Re: bzr revert

From: Robert Collins <robertc@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:37:34 +1100

On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 00:02 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> I was more thinking of the resulting changeset and what you meant by
> your statement above
>
> "you are committing a changeset that happens to alter previously done
> work, but bzr does not consider this a cherrypick or merge - the undo
> will propogate."
>
> I.e. how does a commit of the results of "bzr revert -r X" differ from a
> commit of the results of "bzr merge -r -1..X"?

In current bzr, not at all.

In future, when the cherrypicking planned changes are made; bzr will
know that the changesets from -1..X have been backed out, rather than
just the textual changes being reversed.

-Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.

Received on Wed Mar 26 2008 - 17:36:50 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 13:00:10 MDT