Re: Suggested 3.0 merge candidates

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:04:24 +0200

tis 2008-04-08 klockan 13:23 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries:

> Is there a security problem with them being set?
> IMO its just a cleanup otherwise (already voted those not to go back).

It's not even a source change, just a bzr attributes cleanup. But the
current situation may confuse some unexperienced users.

> > - Windows port: Released name of Longhorn Server is Windows Server 2008
>
> This one I consider one of the cleanup patches (already voted not to go
> back).
> But if we get two votes for it. Fine, its small enough code change.

I guess it's a question to Guido. It's Windows only, and if it's a
change that will be in released binaries then it should go in.

> Everything labeled "Bug NNN" is default backport IMO unless I have a
> reason not to (ie its a bug in the 3.1 new code).

Well, some Bug NNN is feature requests or submissions, not bugs.. And
not all bugs get a Bug NNN.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue Apr 08 2008 - 07:06:17 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 12:00:07 MDT