Re: 3.2 plans

On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 14:23 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> We already discussed it way back, you, myself, and Henrik came to the
> conclusion that priority milestones rather than time-based ones would be
> better for releases.

Can you point to that thread? "Priority milestone" does not ring a bell
for me.

> > For example, is the following an accurate definition?
> >
> > Priority value (1 being the highest) may be assigned by the developer
> > responsible for the feature to represent the relative value of that
> > feature to other Squid projects by that developer. When no developer is
> > responsible, the priority may be assigned by the Project to represent
> > the overall importance of the feature for developers. Priority has no
> > effect on feature acceptance.
>
> Yes. Maybe a priority 0 'hands off I'm already neck deep into the code
> here' as highest though.

OK. We can try to use this and see if it helps or hurts.

Thank you,

Alex.
Received on Fri Aug 22 2008 - 03:34:03 MDT