Re: HTTP/1.1

From: Alex Rousskov <>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:22:26 -0700

On 02/18/2009 03:28 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> I've been giving this a good look over recently. We appear to now
> have clients wanting to migrate from 2.7 to 3.1 and naturally need the
> same HTTP/1.1 support as in 2.7.
> One of the things I've tried to do was update Roberts old HTTP/1.1
> checklist to wiki (DONE:, and
> tick off more of the entries with current info from the testing Yahoo!
> did for us.
> That second, seems to largely be a washout though, as the requirements
> testing report shows each detailed pass/fail nicely, but does not
> reference them cleanly to the RFC section to tick off the checklist :(
FWIW, each test case links to the RFC 2616 paragraph(s) it checks (among
other things). It is possible that the report you were looking at lost
that information during transmission and summation. In any case, it
would require a non-trivial effort to reconcile the information from the
generated report and Robert's checklist.


> Is anyone available to:
> (a) go over the current checklist and assist with ticking entries off.
> (b) test 3.1 for its current status, and see what needs doing to make
> it at least on par with the server-side support in 2.7
> (c) test 3.1 for noticeable issues when 1.1 is turned on.
> Amos
Received on Thu Feb 19 2009 - 06:22:24 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 19 2009 - 12:00:03 MST