Re: SBuf review at r9370

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:11:17 +1300

Kinkie wrote:
>> Um, IMO its better to be liberal with length() and very,very conservative
>> with len_.
>
> I think I reached a sensible compromise, however subjective.
> I ask you not to be too strict now, but to feel free to change it
> after the branch lands into trunk.
>
>> Dumping stuff and pointer maths particularly is one place its often
>> better/safer to use "const length() const" instead of len_, unless the math
>> is actually intended to change len_.
>
> Sure. I _think_ that the only leftover read-access to len_ is in
> dump() which prints the low-level details of the SBuf.
>
>>> now using xmin() and xmax() as per Amos' suggestion.
>> !! no 'x' :)
>
> Those are the only ones I could find in util.h...
>

Ah. The ones I'm on about are in compat through config.h

Thanks for the hint, looks like I'll have to kill the util versions in
my cleanup.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE13
   Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.5
Received on Sat Feb 28 2009 - 06:10:55 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Feb 28 2009 - 12:00:04 MST