Re: [PATCH] Bug 2680: ** helper errors after -k rotate

From: Robert Collins <robertc_at_robertcollins.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:07:53 +1000

On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 00:52 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> Or 4, go back to don't strictly enforce the number of helpers?

+1

I don't know what this strictly-enforce thing is, but it sounds unneeded
as we used to fire up the right number of helpers anyway.

-Rob

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

Received on Tue Jul 14 2009 - 23:08:01 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alex Rousskov: "Re: Importing recent trunk changes to 3.1"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [PATCH] Bug 2680: ** helper errors after -k rotate"
In reply to: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [PATCH] Bug 2680: ** helper errors after -k rotate"
Next in thread: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [PATCH] Bug 2680: ** helper errors after -k rotate"
Reply: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [PATCH] Bug 2680: ** helper errors after -k rotate"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 15 2009 - 12:00:05 MDT