Re: Stateful helpers cleanup (big axe)

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:07:08 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom
<henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net> wrote:
> Looking at the stateful helpers code I noticed we still have the
> deferred concept, even if it's not used at all.
>
> As part of preparing the code for concurrent helper protocol for
> NTLM/Negotiate I propose dropping the deferred support, and possibly the
> helper resets as well as there isn't really any distinction between
> reset and release when there is no deferred requests.
>
> Regards
> Henrik

+1. The less states the better.

Amos
Received on Sun Aug 02 2009 - 22:31:30 MDT