Re: Stateful helpers cleanup (big axe)

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:41:40 +1200

On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 07:32:21 +1000, Robert Collins
<robertc_at_robertcollins.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 23:28 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>> mån 2009-08-03 klockan 07:11 +1000 skrev Robert Collins:
>>
>> > There's still going to be the concept of 'tcp connection X needs auth
>> > helper Y to send its next step on'; this is essentially deferred
>> > requests.
>>
>> No, that's the RESERVED state..
>> ...
>
>> Of course I am not proposing axing away anything currently needed by
>> NTLM/Negotiate. Doing so would be stupid.
>
> :) sorry for adding confusion then.
>
> +1 from me on nuking deferred.
>
> Are youo coordinating with Andrew Bartlett on getting
> overlapping/concurrent stuff in the winbind helpers?
>

Oh yeah, on that front.
I've contemplated and think it would be very useful to publish a little bit
of exemplar logic for third-party helpers to detect whether or not Squid is
sending concurrent requests. That way the third-parties are not limited to
a particular squid version.

Amos
Received on Sun Aug 02 2009 - 23:41:46 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 03 2009 - 12:00:07 MDT