Re: Build failed in Hudson: 3.1-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #14

From: Robert Collins <robertc_at_robertcollins.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 07:08:57 +1000

On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 22:52 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> Yes.
>
> With no dependencies to guide it make reorders as it sees fit for the
> day, especially if running parallel jobs.

We should be fine if we just list the dependencies.

-Rob

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

Received on Sun Sep 06 2009 - 21:09:03 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: Patch to authenticate securely to upstream ISA server(or others)"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: Build failed in Hudson: 3.1-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #14"
In reply to: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: Build failed in Hudson: 3.1-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #14"
Next in thread: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: Build failed in Hudson: 3.1-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #14"
Reply: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: Build failed in Hudson: 3.1-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #14"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Sep 07 2009 - 12:00:04 MDT